
2025-05-20
Why FIDIC Contracts Rule Globally
What That Means for Projects in Kenya
Introduction
In construction and infrastructure development, the choice of contract is as important as the design or budget. The contract governs risk allocation, defines roles and responsibilities, and ensures that projects are executed in a legally sound and commercially viable manner. Globally, FIDIC contracts have emerged as the leading standard for international projects. But what is a “suite contract,” and how do options like FIDIC compare with local forms such as those issued by Kenya’s Ministry of Public Works?
In this article, the authors explain the concept of suite contracts, the reasons behind FIDIC’s global dominance, and how FIDIC compares to Kenyan-standard forms of contract.
What is a Suite Contract?
A suite contract refers to a set of standardised construction contracts created by a recognised institution, designed to cater to different project types, procurement methods, and relationships. Each form within the suite maintains a consistent structure, terminology, and approach—offering predictability and ease of use across projects.
Contract suites provide variations for:
- Design-bid-build (employer designs)
- Design and build (contractor designs)
- Turnkey or EPC (single point of responsibility)
- Short form or small works contracts
- Subcontracts and consultancy agreements
Globally Recognised Contract Suites
Several internationally recognised contract suites are used across various jurisdictions including:
- FIDIC Suite – Widely used for infrastructure and engineering projects.
- NEC Suite – Popular in the UK and Commonwealth countries, known for promoting collaboration.
- JCT Contracts – Common in UK building projects.
- AIA Contract Documents – Widely used in the United States.
- ConsensusDocs – US-based, focused on collaborative delivery.
- Australian Standards (AS), GC21 – Widely adopted in Australia and New Zealand.
Why FIDIC Leads Globally
The FIDIC (Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils) suite of contracts is considered the gold standard in international construction for several reasons. These include:
- Global Recognition: Used in over 100 countries, and endorsed by the World Bank, AfDB, ADB, and others.
- Balanced Risk Allocation: Ensures a fair sharing of risk between the employer and contractor.
- Adaptability: Suitable for diverse legal systems, with optional clauses and flexible provisions.
- Comprehensive Guidance: Includes explanatory notes for application and interpretation.
- Neutral Terminology: Free from jurisdiction-specific legal jargon, enhancing cross-border use.
Among FIDIC’s suite, the Red Book (1999 edition) is commonly used for employer-designed construction. For donor-funded projects, especially those backed by multilateral development banks (MDBs), the FIDIC Red Book MDB Harmonised Edition is typically required.
Construction Contract Suites in Kenya
In Kenya, both international and local standard forms are used. The FIDIC suite is widely adopted, especially for infrastructure projects funded by international financiers. Locally, the Ministry of Public Works provides standard forms tailored for government-funded projects.
The commonly used construction contracts in Kenya are:
- FIDIC Suite: this is used for roads, dams, energy, and donor-funded infrastructure. The forms used are Red Book (Design-Bid-Build), Yellow Book (Design & Build), Silver Book (Turnkey), and MDB Harmonised Edition.
- Kenyan Ministry of Public Works Forms: This is used for government-funded schools, clinics and buildings. The form used is General conditions for building works, civil works, and nominated subcontractors.
- Joint Building Contracts Committee of Kenya (JBCC) Contracts (adapted from South Africa): Occasionally used by private developers for commercial projects.
Comparison between FIDIC and JBCC Kenya Contracts
If you are looking at choosing between FIDIC and JBCC Contracts for a project in Kenya, the nature, scale, funding source, and stakeholders involved are key factors. For donor-funded or infrastructure-heavy works, FIDIC is often preferred. For smaller-scale, domestic building projects, JBCC Kenya is more practical. Other comparisons between the two include:
Feature | FIDIC | JBCC | |
Origin & Use | |||
Origin | International (Swiss-based organization) | Local (Kenyan construction industry stakeholders) | |
Usage | Widely used globally, including in Kenya for large-scale or international projects | Primarily used in Kenya for local building projects, especially by government and private developers | |
Types of Contracts Available | |||
Contract Types | Red Book (construction), Yellow Book (design & build), Silver Book (EPC/turnkey), Green Book (short form), etc. | Principal Building Agreement, Nominated Subcontract Agreement, Minor Works Agreement, etc. | |
Flexibility | Highly flexible for various project structures | More suited to traditional building contracts in the Kenyan context | |
Legal Framework | |||
Governing Law | Often customized; may be subject to international or local law | Governed by Kenyan law and practice | |
Dispute Resolution | Encourages Dispute Adjudication Boards (DAB), arbitration | Arbitration under Kenyan law; mediation sometimes encouraged | |
Risk Allocation | |||
Risk Sharing | Balanced but depends on contract type (e.g., Silver Book shifts more risk to contractor) | Risk generally more balanced but leans towards protecting the employer in traditional setups | |
Force Majeure | Defined and detailed in contract | Covered but often interpreted under Kenyan legal principles | |
Claims & Variations | |||
Claims Procedure | Structured timeline (e.g., 28 days to notify claims) | Less rigid but requires written notices and documentation | |
Variations | Detailed procedures for approval and valuation | Similar mechanisms but generally simpler and more informal | |
Administration & Supervision | |||
Contract Administrator | Often the Engineer (independent role) | Architect or Principal Agent acts on behalf of the employer | |
Certification | Engineer certifies works/payment | Architect certifies progress, completion, and payment | |
Suitability & Popularity | |||
Best For | Complex, large-scale, donor-funded, or international projects | Local building projects (e.g., schools, residential, commercial) | |
Popularity in Kenya | Used for infrastructure and PPP projects | Widely used for private and government building works | |
Summary
Feature | FIDIC | JBCC |
International Applicability | High | Low |
Ease of Use for Local Practitioners | Medium | High |
Risk Allocation Flexibility | High | Moderate |
Cost of Implementation | Typically higher | Generally lower |
Training Required | Often needed for proper administration | More familiar to local professionals |
Comparison between FIDIC Red Book and Kenyan Public Works Form
ASPECT | KENYAN PUBLIC WORKS FORM | FIDIC RED BOOK (1999 EDITION) |
Origin | Ministry of Public Works (Kenya | FIDIC (International) |
Design Responsibility | Employer | Employer |
Risk Allocation | Employer-biased | Balanced |
Dispute Resolution | Courts or arbitration | DAB + arbitration |
Payment Certification | By Architect/Engineer | By Engineer (measured works) |
Force Majeure | Basic clauses | Detailed in Clause 19 |
Use in Donor Projects | Rarely accepted | Preferred/required |
Governing Law | Kenyan Law | As agreed (often local law) |
In summary, the Kenyan Public Works Form is suitable for smaller, locally funded public projects, while FIDIC is the contract of choice for larger, more complex, or donor-funded infrastructure projects—offering stronger risk management and dispute mechanisms.
Conclusion
For clients, contractors, consultants, and developers, understanding the right form of contract is essential to managing risk, ensuring compliance, and securing project success. Globally, FIDIC has earned its place as the preferred contract suite for good reason—clarity, balance, and international usability. However, in the Kenyan context, familiarity with both FIDIC and local forms such as those issued by the Ministry of Public Works is crucial.
Need Help Choosing or Customising a Construction Contract?
At MMC ASAFO, our Construction & Infrastructure team advises public and private sector clients on contract drafting, negotiation, and dispute resolution. Whether you’re undertaking a local project or navigating a donor-funded infrastructure contract, we can help ensure your contracts are aligned with your objectives and compliant with both local and international standards.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Parties should seek specific legal counsel tailored to their project before entering into any contract.
Find us on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mmc-advocates-muriu-mungai-and-company-advocates-_constructionlaw-fidic-kenyalaw-activity-7330523302593015808-yqz6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAABOTy5kB8Puvbvv0UyeD9x3gzbwR5YJ4ssk
DANIEL MUSYOKA , SOLOMON OPOLE